<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Shrimplin, Aaron</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5111" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle>Aaron Shrimplin</subtitle>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5111</id>
<updated>2026-04-08T06:52:25Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T06:52:25Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Are E-Book Big Deal Bundles Still Valuable?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5287" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shrimplin, Aaron K</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bazeley, Jennifer W</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5287</id>
<updated>2016-03-08T15:24:16Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Are E-Book Big Deal Bundles Still Valuable?
Shrimplin, Aaron K; Bazeley, Jennifer W
The academic e‐book market has undergone significant change in the last five years. E‐book availability has&#13;
greatly increased as library demand has grown, with an increasing percentage of library acquisitions&#13;
preferring electronic rather than print format. E‐book acquisition models like patron‐driven acquisition and&#13;
short‐term loan have now become commonplace and available from a multitude of consortia, publishers, and&#13;
aggregators. With the wide availability of these models, is there still value in buying e‐books through package&#13;
deals?&#13;
To help answer this question, we will present the results of a usage‐based analysis of Wiley e‐books. Since&#13;
2012, Miami University Libraries have purchased Wiley e‐book collections through a consortial OhioLINK&#13;
contract. Previously purchased OhioLINK e‐book collections have been accessible to patrons through both&#13;
OhioLINK’s Electronic Book Center platform and the publisher platform. The Wiley e‐book purchase deviates&#13;
from previous practice by being available to patrons only on the publisher platform and our analysis is&#13;
therefore focused on COUNTER e‐book usage reports from the Wiley platform. We also augment the usage&#13;
data with title‐level information, such as subject and book type. This preliminary study focuses on the 2012&#13;
Wiley collection and its use over a three‐year period (2012‐2014) and will include data‐driven findings&#13;
presented in visually useful ways.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Information Architecture: Information for Web Developers</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5252" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Withers, Rob</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Casson, Robert D</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shrimplin, Aaron</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Adams, Katherine</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5252</id>
<updated>2016-03-15T19:01:22Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Information Architecture: Information for Web Developers
Withers, Rob; Casson, Robert D; Shrimplin, Aaron; Adams, Katherine
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Minding Your Ps &amp; Qs: A Q-Methodology Workshop</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5203" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Brinkman, Stacy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Messner, Kevin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shrimplin, Aaron</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Waller, Jen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Waller, Jen</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5203</id>
<updated>2016-03-08T15:24:20Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Minding Your Ps &amp; Qs: A Q-Methodology Workshop
Brinkman, Stacy; Messner, Kevin; Shrimplin, Aaron; Waller, Jen; Waller, Jen
Librarians are continually turning to new metrics to evaluate services, impact, and priorities. Q-methodology - a hybrid of qualitative and quantitative research techniques - is a systematic study of subjectivity that enables researches to understand user's beliefs or attitudes about particular issues. This workshop will train librarians to utilize Q-methodology through hands-on activities. Librarians will learn tangible skills that they can use to assess services, collections, and initiatives at their home institutions.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Book Lovers, Technophiles, Printers and Pragmatists: The Social and Demographic Structure of User Attitudes toward e-Books</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5191" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Revelle, Andrew</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Messner, Kevin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shrimplin, Aaron</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hurst, Susan</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5191</id>
<updated>2016-03-08T15:24:41Z</updated>
<published>2012-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Book Lovers, Technophiles, Printers and Pragmatists: The Social and Demographic Structure of User Attitudes toward e-Books
Revelle, Andrew; Messner, Kevin; Shrimplin, Aaron; Hurst, Susan
Q-methodology was used to identify clusters of opinions about e-books at&#13;
Miami University. The research identified four distinct opinion types among&#13;
those investigated: Book Lovers, Technophiles, Pragmatists, and Printers.&#13;
The initial Q-methodology study results were then used as a basis for a&#13;
large-n survey of undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty so that&#13;
we could have a more complete picture of the demographic and social&#13;
makeup of the campus population. Results from that survey indicate&#13;
that academic discipline is strongly associated with the respondents’&#13;
opinion types. Gender and educational status are also associated with&#13;
respondents’ opinion types.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
