<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shrimplin, Aaron</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5111</link>
<description>Aaron Shrimplin</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T08:21:24Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Are E-Book Big Deal Bundles Still Valuable?</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5287</link>
<description>Are E-Book Big Deal Bundles Still Valuable?
Shrimplin, Aaron K; Bazeley, Jennifer W
The academic e‐book market has undergone significant change in the last five years. E‐book availability has&#13;
greatly increased as library demand has grown, with an increasing percentage of library acquisitions&#13;
preferring electronic rather than print format. E‐book acquisition models like patron‐driven acquisition and&#13;
short‐term loan have now become commonplace and available from a multitude of consortia, publishers, and&#13;
aggregators. With the wide availability of these models, is there still value in buying e‐books through package&#13;
deals?&#13;
To help answer this question, we will present the results of a usage‐based analysis of Wiley e‐books. Since&#13;
2012, Miami University Libraries have purchased Wiley e‐book collections through a consortial OhioLINK&#13;
contract. Previously purchased OhioLINK e‐book collections have been accessible to patrons through both&#13;
OhioLINK’s Electronic Book Center platform and the publisher platform. The Wiley e‐book purchase deviates&#13;
from previous practice by being available to patrons only on the publisher platform and our analysis is&#13;
therefore focused on COUNTER e‐book usage reports from the Wiley platform. We also augment the usage&#13;
data with title‐level information, such as subject and book type. This preliminary study focuses on the 2012&#13;
Wiley collection and its use over a three‐year period (2012‐2014) and will include data‐driven findings&#13;
presented in visually useful ways.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5287</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Information Architecture: Information for Web Developers</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5252</link>
<description>Information Architecture: Information for Web Developers
Withers, Rob; Casson, Robert D; Shrimplin, Aaron; Adams, Katherine
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5252</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Minding Your Ps &amp; Qs: A Q-Methodology Workshop</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5203</link>
<description>Minding Your Ps &amp; Qs: A Q-Methodology Workshop
Brinkman, Stacy; Messner, Kevin; Shrimplin, Aaron; Waller, Jen; Waller, Jen
Librarians are continually turning to new metrics to evaluate services, impact, and priorities. Q-methodology - a hybrid of qualitative and quantitative research techniques - is a systematic study of subjectivity that enables researches to understand user's beliefs or attitudes about particular issues. This workshop will train librarians to utilize Q-methodology through hands-on activities. Librarians will learn tangible skills that they can use to assess services, collections, and initiatives at their home institutions.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5203</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Book Lovers, Technophiles, Printers and Pragmatists: The Social and Demographic Structure of User Attitudes toward e-Books</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5191</link>
<description>Book Lovers, Technophiles, Printers and Pragmatists: The Social and Demographic Structure of User Attitudes toward e-Books
Revelle, Andrew; Messner, Kevin; Shrimplin, Aaron; Hurst, Susan
Q-methodology was used to identify clusters of opinions about e-books at&#13;
Miami University. The research identified four distinct opinion types among&#13;
those investigated: Book Lovers, Technophiles, Pragmatists, and Printers.&#13;
The initial Q-methodology study results were then used as a basis for a&#13;
large-n survey of undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty so that&#13;
we could have a more complete picture of the demographic and social&#13;
makeup of the campus population. Results from that survey indicate&#13;
that academic discipline is strongly associated with the respondents’&#13;
opinion types. Gender and educational status are also associated with&#13;
respondents’ opinion types.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/5191</guid>
<dc:date>2012-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
