Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSummerville, Amyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-25T19:30:34Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-10T15:09:41Z
dc.date.available2011-07-25T19:30:34Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-07-10T15:09:41Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-25en_US
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/4437en_US
dc.description.abstractDecision-makers faced with an opportunity to learn the outcome of a foregone alternative must balance anticipated regret, should that information be unfavorable, with the potential benefits of this information in reducing experienced regret. Counterfactualseeking, the choice to learn more about foregone alternatives, may be a functional, regretregulating strategy for individuals already experiencing regret. Counterfactual-seeking increases in response to dissatisfying outcomes (Studies 1 & 2). Counterfactual-seeking is generally able to reduce dissatisfaction (Study 2), regardless of whether individuals personally chose to view this information or were randomly assigned to do so (Study 3). Moreover, both imaginative (versus factual) thoughts about the foregone option and upward (versus downward) counterfactual thoughts play a role in this improvement in satisfaction (Study 4). Regret thus has a complex influence in how individuals engage with counterfactual information.en_US
dc.subjectcounterfactualen_US
dc.subjectregreten_US
dc.subjectdecision-makingen_US
dc.subjectaffecten_US
dc.subjectinformation seekingen_US
dc.titleCounterfactual-seeking: The scenic overlook of the road not takenen_US
dc.description.versionIn press at Personality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.date.published2011en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record